<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://digitalmash.com/site/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Blue Pixel Musings</title>
    <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>member@bluepixel.net</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2012</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2012-01-28T23:41:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Take Time to Organize</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/take_time_to_organize/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/take_time_to_organize/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm not much for New Year's resolutions, but there’s one thing I do every year at this time. So if someone asks what my resolution is, I always say, "I'm going to get organized." For me that means every January I go through my images from the past year and pick out my favorites.	<p>One of the few downsides to digital photography is that we shoot far more photos than ever before. That’s great as a learning process, and to make sure we get good pictures, but the downside is having lots and lots of photos. And that means we need to take more time to go through them, sorting the good from the bad and backing them up. Here’s how I manage that process:</p>

	<p>First, I download my pictures as soon as possible. End of the same day if I can, into a folder whose name is the date they were shot (for instance, January 11, 2012 would be 20120111, so the year always comes first). During that download I have the software managing the download re-name the files with that date, plus a bit more information. One of the photos from a recent night shoot in Boston (you can see the photos at <a href="http://www.Facebook.com/KCphotographer">http://www.Facebook.com/KCphotographer</a>, in the Current Work album) has the filename 20120107_Boston_037. This makes it easy for me to know where and when a photo was shot. </p>

	<p>Next, I copy those folders to two hard drives. One for long-term backup (that gets rotated off-site), one to a server in my office that I can access immediately. And every so often when I have time I go through the most recent photos, pick my favorites, and copy them to a “Best of” folder for that year. </p>

	<p>And that brings me back to January. That’s when I go through the “Best of” folder for the previous year and cull it. I’m always a better judge of my pictures after some time has passed. So come January I re-visit that collection and narrow it down to those photos that really belong there. Then that year’s “Best of” folder gets burned to <span class="caps">DVD</span> and goes into my safe-deposit box. This year that was 2 <span class="caps">DVD</span>s, which is far easier to manage than all the <span class="caps">DVD</span>s that have everything I shot over the year. They can stay on a shelf at home. If they’re lost, but the “Best of” collection is safe, I’m happy.</p>

	<p>So if I have a New Year’s resolution each year, it’s to stay organized, stay on top of all the photos I shoot, and make sure that the best of those are stored for the future. And that’s a worthwhile resolution for every photographer to have.</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/Hierarchy.JPG" alt="My folder and file naming system.My folder and file naming system.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20120126_NDE_129.JPG" alt="All my photos from 2012, and the two DVDs with just the best from the year.All my photos from 2012, and the two DVDs with just the best from the year.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20120119_SafeDeposit_008E.JPG" alt="The safe deposit box, where all of my most important documents, and photos, are stored.The safe deposit box, where all of my most important documents, and photos, are stored.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Technology, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2012-01-28T23:41:56+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Off&#45;Camera Flash</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/off-camera_flash1/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/off-camera_flash1/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I was on the road teaching a workshop last week, and part of it involved giving a little how-to on the basics of off-camera flash. The group was amazed at how easy it is. That’s true now, but it wasn’t always that way.	<p>Back in the old days (pre-2004), getting the flash away from the camera required either cords or expensive remotes. So despite the much-better pictures that could be made, few people bothered. Which was a shame.</p>

	<p>Light coming directly from the camera can light up the subject if they’re close enough. And that’s okay if it’s the only way to get a picture. But it’s not very pleasing light. Since it’s coming from the same position as the camera, it’s what we’d call “flat light,” meaning it doesn’t show depth, shape or texture. You need light from the side to do that. And as I said, prior to 2004 I needed to use wires connected to the flash to get it off to the side, or radio remotes.</p>

	<p>In 2004 Nikon introduced the D70, their first camera with their <span class="caps">CLS</span> (Creative Lighting System) built into it. That meant that its pop-up strobe could, through the camera’s menus, be configured to control off-camera Nikon strobes. That was a real game-changer, making it very easy to do off-camera flash.</p>

	<p>Since then most of Nikon’s mid-range cameras do that, from the D90 through the D700 currently, supported by their main strobes (the SB-600, SB-700, SB-800, SB-900 and the just announced SB-910). And other companies like Sony, and more recently Canon, have included that ability too.</p>

	<p>Which is a great thing for us photographers. We live and die by light, and the quality of it. Because being able to get the flash away from the camera doesn’t just mean better light, it means better pictures.</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20120111_Joplin_093A_1.JPG" alt="Indoors, the light's boring and the resulting slow shutter speed means a bad picture.Indoors, the light's boring and the resulting slow shutter speed means a bad picture.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20120111_Joplin_094_1.JPG" alt="On-camera flash solved the blur problem, but the light's boring and throws a shadow on the background.On-camera flash solved the blur problem, but the light's boring and throws a shadow on the background.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20120111_Joplin_095_1.JPG" alt="Getting the flash off-camera, up to the right, creates light and shadows across the subject that brings the photo to life.Getting the flash off-camera, up to the right, creates light and shadows across the subject that brings the photo to life.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Camera Gear, Technology, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2012-01-16T03:52:05+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Long Exposures at Night</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/long_exposures_at_night/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/long_exposures_at_night/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I received an email from a friend who's headed to Iceland and hoping to photograph the northern lights (aka the aurora borealis). He was looking for tips on how to be successful, and after responding to him, I thought this might make for a nice blog post. Whether you're shooting northern lights, a starry sky or New Year's eve fireworks, the basics are the same.	<p>Any time you&#8217;re trying to photograph at night, in what we jokingly refer to as &#8220;available dark,&#8221; there are a few things to keep in mind.</p>

	<p>First, the camera will need to be rock-solid, so I always suggest a good tripod. If you don&#8217;t have a tripod, find something you can set the camera on so you&#8217;re not holding it. Night exposures generally require the shutter to be open several seconds or longer, which rules out hand-holding the camera. </p>

	<p>Then you need a way to trip the shutter without moving the camera. Best is an electronic cable release, but if you don&#8217;t have one, you can often get away with using the camera&#8217;s self-timer. With it turned on, you can step away from the camera and let it trip the shutter at the end of ten seconds (or whatever time you have it set for). Most cameras today will let you set them for up to a thirty-second exposure. If you need to go beyond that, then you&#8217;ll need a locking release and want to use the &#8220;Bulb&#8221; setting. With &#8220;Bulb&#8221; set, the shutter will stay open as long as the shutter button is depressed, With a locking cable that can be two minutes or twenty.</p>

	<p>Finding a good exposure can be tough, but it&#8217;s much easier today with digital cameras and their <span class="caps">LCD</span>s on the back. A liberal application of trial and error usually gets you there. If you&#8217;re shooting something with a bright light source (like fireworks), then you&#8217;ll probably want to start at a low <span class="caps">ISO</span> (200?), perhaps f/8 and two seconds. I prefer to set the camera for manual exposure rather than automatic, so I can easily make changes based on what I&#8217;m seeing. If the resulting photo&#8217;s too bright, then change to f/11 or f/16 (letting less light in by making the aperture smaller). If it&#8217;s too dark, go the other way (perhaps f/5.6). If you want to capture multiple bursts of fireworks, then go for a longer exposure with the shutter (perhaps ten seconds?). I&#8217;d set my white balance for incandescent or daylight, but automatic might work fine for this as well.</p>

	<p>The autofocus systems on our cameras rely on light, so doing in-focus night shots can be hard for them. My preference is to turn off the autofocus and manually focus. I can usually find something in the scene that&#8217;s bright enough to do that. If it&#8217;s going to be really dark (like it will be for the northern lights, or star fields), then I try to set my focus on a far distant object before dark, then tape down the focus ring.</p>

	<p>And speaking of the northern lights or star fields, they&#8217;re even tougher to shoot because there&#8217;s much less light, requiring a lot of exposure. I’d suggest shooting with the lens nearly as wide open as possible (f/4-5.6), and an <span class="caps">ISO</span> of 1600. Then try a thirty-second exposure first and see what happens. Remember that if you need to go longer, you have to double the exposure to let in twice the light. In other words, two-minutes will give you twice the light of one minute, but you&#8217;d have to go to four-minutes now to double that again. Long-exposure noise (image degradation) can happen with exposures beyond one minute, but the cooler the weather, the less that&#8217;s a problem. So there&#8217;s at least one advantage to doing night shots in cold weather.</p>

	<p>Most people don&#8217;t shoot pictures at night, so it&#8217;s a great opportunity to do something unique and different. Cook up a pot of hot chocolate, fill the thermos, grab your hat and gloves and get out there!</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20100804_KiliD3229_.JPG" alt="20-seconds, f/5, 4000 ISO.20-seconds, f/5, 4000 ISO.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/070400fir014.JPG" alt="4-seconds, f/10, 200 ISO.4-seconds, f/10, 200 ISO.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111011_SwissD1_188.JPG" alt="3-seconds, f/22, ISO 100.3-seconds, f/22, ISO 100.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111014_SwissD4_255.JPG" alt="15-seconds, f/2.8, 400 ISO.15-seconds, f/2.8, 400 ISO.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111026_Balt_202.JPG" alt="8-seconds, f/16, 200 ISO.8-seconds, f/16, 200 ISO.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Camera Gear, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-12-30T21:08:48+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Size Matters</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/no_substitute_for_focal_length/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/no_substitute_for_focal_length/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[As photographers we know the importance of light, composition, background, exposure, and moment. But sometimes what you really need for a unique photo is a lot of lens, and that can help you make a photo no one else is able to.	<p>This year I led two trips to Africa. And each time, while I had a very nice telephoto lens with me (Nikkor 200-400mm), there were times I wished I had more. So after returning from the second trip, I started looking for a 600mm lens. During that search I was reminded that Nikon used to make some longer lenses (thanks Sharlie!). And so I found myself buying a used Nikkor 800mm f/5.6 lens. Twelve pounds, 23-inches, manual focus only. It&#8217;s a beast to carry, and a challenge to focus on moving subjects. But man, when you get everything right, you&#8217;ve got the chance to make photos no one else can. I&#8217;ve only used it twice so far, but both times it paid off.</p>

	<p>When I&#8217;m home and the Kansas City Chiefs are playing, I try to get out to Arrowhead Stadium for the games. In early October I was there for the Vikings game, with the 800mm. When Chiefs quarterback Matt Cassel spiked the ball on third down early in the game, I followed him as he headed to the bench. Heated words were exchanged between him and head coach Todd Haley, and everyone saw it on TV. Thanks to the 800mm lens, shooting from across the field, I was the only still photographer to capture that. Which means it got good use in newspapers and the web. </p>

	<p>This past weekend I went out for the Chiefs and Packers game, with my 800 again (and the 200-400 for closer action). We all expected the unbeaten Packers to continue their streak against the Chiefs, and were shocked when the Chiefs were still leading late in the game. The Chiefs were playing with a new quarterback (Kyle Orton) and new interim coach, Romeo Crennel. I figured there might be some excitement on the sidelines if the Chiefs held on for the win. So with two-minutes left, I moved across the field from the coach, put my 800 on him, and waited. And then got lucky. With about a minute left, and the Chiefs able to run out the clock, linebacker Justin Houston came up behind Crennel and dumped a cooler on him. And then the team started congratulating him on the win. Once again, thanks to that long lens, I was the only photographer I know of that got those shots. And again they got good play.</p>

	<p>Good photographers use all the tools they&#8217;ve got to make good pictures. And knowledge is one of the most important of those tools. But sometimes, it comes down to equipment. And in this case, I was the lucky one with the longest lens. Now I can&#8217;t wait to take it to Africa!</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/ReedChiefs800.JPG" alt="Me with the 800mm lens, 200-400 in my lap. As always, I'm a fashion statement.Me with the 800mm lens, 200-400 in my lap. As always, I'm a fashion statement.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111002_Chiefs_285.JPG" alt="Cassel and Haley disagreeing.Cassel and Haley disagreeing.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111218_Chiefs_464.JPG" alt="Crennel getting doused.Crennel getting doused.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111218_Chiefs_484.JPG" alt="Celebrating with Crennel.Celebrating with Crennel.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Camera Gear, Travel, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T12:48:37+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>How to Photograph Holiday Lights</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/how_to_photograph_holiday_lights/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/how_to_photograph_holiday_lights/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Every holiday season the Country Club plaza in Kansas City is decorated in lights. It's a beautiful scene, and well worth the visit if you're in town. Light displays like this are a lot of fun to photograph, if you know a few simple tips to get the photos you want.	<p>Any time you&#8217;re shooting photos at night, outdoors, you can expect slow shutter speeds. What&#8217;s slow? I say any time the shutter goes below 1/30 second. Above that, if you use good technique holding the camera steady, you should be able to get a sharp picture (unless your subject&#8217;s moving). Below that and you&#8217;ll probably get blur just from holding the camera. So the first trick is to have a stable way of supporting the camera. The simplest solution for that is a tripod. If you don&#8217;t have a tripod, find a place to set the camera. Remember the &#8220;Luck and Lightning&#8221; post I wrote in October? To get that photo I set the camera on my camera bag atop the bridge railing. You can use walls, railings, the ground or anything else that&#8217;s not moving. That helps you minimize the chance of adding blur when shooting the picture.</p>

	<p>Of course, you can still cause blur by pushing the shutter button. That&#8217;s easily avoided too, by using the camera&#8217;s self timer. With that turned on, when you push the shutter button, the camera waits a few seconds before shooting (and some cameras, like Nikons, now let you set that delay from two-seconds to twenty). </p>

	<p>Since you&#8217;ve already dealt with keeping the camera steady, you don&#8217;t need a high <span class="caps">ISO</span>. Most cameras are set to Auto <span class="caps">ISO</span>, which means they&#8217;ll raise the <span class="caps">ISO</span> if there&#8217;s not much light. Sometimes you need that, but you get &#8220;noise&#8221; (a graininess to the image) and lose color saturation. So set the <span class="caps">ISO</span> manually, to 100 or 200. An added benefit to this is that your shutter speed will often be so low you get blur in any movement, like cars driving by. That can be a nice effect.</p>

	<p>The next problem can be focus. Cameras need light to focus, so they can struggle at night. If yours is, then simply turn it off. By switching to manual focus you can adjust it yourself, and it&#8217;s usually fairly easy to do that.</p>

	<p>The other thing your camera will want to do at night is use its flash. Don&#8217;t let it. If you have Scene Modes, there&#8217;s often a &#8220;No Flash&#8221; mode. If not, try the Program exposure mode. In that, the camera will only use the flash if you tell it to (by popping it up).</p>

	<p>If your camera has any kind of image stabilization technology (VR, IS or SteadyShot), turn it off. When doing long exposures (night shots for instance), that can actually add blur to the photos, by creating movement where there isn&#8217;t any.</p>

	<p>Your camera creates color using something called White Balance. Most cameras are set to Auto, and you can leave it there if you like the results. However, when I&#8217;m doing shots at night that include artificial lights (instead of the moon), I often change the White Balance setting to Incandescent (sometimes called Tungsten) or fluorescent. I think that gives a more natural look.</p>

	<p>Now all that&#8217;s left is to find a scene worth shooting. Pay attention to your framing. In other words, consider the whole rectangle of the viewfinder to be valuable space, and make sure that what you&#8217;ve got framed in there is what you want. When possible, move closer, When you do, you usually end up with a better picture. And look for places where you can get a different angle from eye level. Parking garages are great for that.</p>

	<p>And don&#8217;t forget to play. Try zooming the lens, or even shaking the camera when taking the picture. Remember the photographer&#8217;s secret &#8211; If you make a mistake and it looks good, say you did it on purpose! </p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111128_Plaza_026.JPG" alt="The Plaza at night, from atop a parking garage.The Plaza at night, from atop a parking garage.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111128_Plaza_062.JPG" alt="Water gives a foreground with reflections.Water gives a foreground with reflections.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111128_Plaza_096.JPG" alt="Multi-second exposure creates a blur of headlights.Multi-second exposure creates a blur of headlights.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111128_Plaza_071.JPG" alt="Low angle under a bridge adds lights and a curve.Low angle under a bridge adds lights and a curve.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111128_Plaza_034.JPG" alt="Zooming the lens during a four-second exposure.Zooming the lens during a four-second exposure.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111128_Plaza_081.JPG" alt="Okay, this one was an accident, but I think it looks cool!Okay, this one was an accident, but I think it looks cool!]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-12-08T01:34:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Birthday Poster</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/birthday_poster/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/birthday_poster/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[My wife Sharon had a birthday this past weekend (can't tell you her age, but it rhymes with "nifty") and celebrated with a big party. One of my gifts was a poster of photos of her over those years, which was a big hit at the party. This can be pretty easy, if you just follow a few simple steps.	<p>The hardest part is getting all the photos together, in digital form. Over the years I&#8217;ve slowly digitized most of our old family pictures that are prints. The easy way is to just photograph them with a digital camera. A decent point-and-shoot camera in close-up mode will do a fine job as long as you have plenty of light. Try putting them on a table near a window, with a good amount of daylight coming in. The other option is to scan them with a flatbed scanner. That can give you better quality, but takes a lot more time. Once the old prints are scanned, collect them into one folder on your computer and then start adding the newer, digital photos you&#8217;ve shot.</p>

	<p>Next you&#8217;ll need to use software to create the poster. You&#8217;ll want what&#8217;s called &#8220;layer-based&#8221; software because it will let you put multiple photos onto one document and move them around. The least expensive common program for this is Adobe&#8217;s Photoshop Elements (under $100). The more expensive Photoshop CS (any version) will do this too, of course. Before you decide on a size for the poster, check around and see how large a print you can have made at local stores (or online, like Mpix.com). I find that lots of places can make poster-sized prints for around $20. In my case I have a large-format printer that will handle paper up to 24-inches wide, so I create a new document that&#8217;s 24-inches wide by 36-inches deep. I set the resolution for 160PPI (pixels per inch) because I know that&#8217;s all I need for good print quality. </p>

	<p>Now for the fun part, making the poster. With Elements you&#8217;ll want to use the &#8220;Place&#8221; command in the file menu to bring each image in. Once it&#8217;s on the page, you can grab any of the &#8220;handles&#8221; on the four corners of that photo to make it larger or smaller, and grab the center of the photo to move it around the page. When you&#8217;ve got it where you want, the size you want, hit the return key. Make sure you have your &#8220;Layers&#8221; window open on screen, so you see each individual photo as its own layer. That lets you click on that layer at a later time and change its size or position, or even delete it. You can use the Type tool to create a type layer with words, and handle it the same way as the other layers.</p>

	<p>If you&#8217;re doing this in Photoshop CS, the process is similar but not exactly the same. With this program you can just drag-and-drop the photos onto the document, no &#8220;Place&#8221; command needed. When you grab a handle to re-size the photo, though, make sure and hold the shift key down too, or you&#8217;ll end up stretching the image instead of just re-sizing it. And if you want to change it later, first select it (click on it) on the Layers palette (or click on the photo while holding down the Control key) and then choose &#8220;Free Transform&#8221; from the Edit menu to get the handles back. Again, hit the return key when you&#8217;re done sizing and moving the picture.</p>

	<p>Be sure and save your work occasionally, and do that as a &#8220;<span class="caps">PSD</span>&#8221; document. That keeps the layers intact so you can change them later. However, when you want to get it printed, you&#8217;ll need to save a copy as a <span class="caps">JPEG</span> file (most printers won&#8217;t be able to work with a <span class="caps">PSD</span> file, and it will be <span class="caps">VERY</span> large). Be sure and keep a version as a <span class="caps">PSD</span>, in case you want to make any other changes in the future.</p>

	<p>Last step is a quick trip to buy a frame. I&#8217;ve had good luck getting frames 50% off at Michael&#8217;s, and have bought those 24 X 36-inch frames before, one of the reasons I chose that size for the poster. About ten minutes to put it in the frame and you&#8217;re done. A great keepsake to hang on the wall.</p>

<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111123_Poster_016A.JPG" alt="Happy birthday Sharon!Happy birthday Sharon!<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/Photos_collected.jpg" alt="Collected photos.Collected photos.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/New_doc_poster.jpg" alt="Create the poster size you want.Create the poster size you want.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/Place_command.jpg" alt="Place command in Elements.Place command in Elements.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/Free_Transform.jpg" alt="Resizing using corner handles.Resizing using corner handles.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/Elements_poster.jpg" alt="Finished poster in Elements.Finished poster in Elements.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Editing</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-11-25T16:44:20+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>One Fan of the Nikon 1</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/one_fan_of_the_nikon_1/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/one_fan_of_the_nikon_1/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[As someone who loves taking pictures, I try to have a camera whenever possible. It's not always convenient to carry an SLR, though, and point-and-shoots can be disappointing. So I was happy to hear that Nikon was entering the "small camera with larger sensor" market. And after using the J1 for a couple of weeks, I've become an ardent fan.	<p>You can read all the press releases and reviews, so I won&#8217;t go into lots of details and features. The sensor is larger than those used in point-and-shoots (and smaller than in <span class="caps">DSLR</span>s), there are two models (J1 and V1), and they both have 10MP of resolution and use interchangeable lenses. That&#8217;s it in a nutshell. If you read the reviews and blog posts on the camera, you&#8217;ll hear occasional concerns that the sensor isn&#8217;t as large as some folks would like, or doesn&#8217;t have the resolution that others want. Whatever. I try to remind people when they ask about cameras that what&#8217;s really important is the quality of the image the camera delivers. And in that area, the J1 doesn&#8217;t disappoint. </p>

	<p>In most situations, these cameras will give great quality with very little fuss &#8211; comparable to an entry-level <span class="caps">DSLR</span> with consumer zooms. In a very, very small package. And that&#8217;s the key here. I&#8217;ve got a <span class="caps">DSLR</span> and lenses. Actually, many <span class="caps">DSLR</span>s and many lenses. But this is the first camera I&#8217;ve had where I can get the kind of photos I want, while carrying very little. In fact, it&#8217;s the first &#8220;real&#8221; camera I&#8217;ve had that I don&#8217;t even notice having around my neck. And I like to joke that my camera bag is now my pocket. The two lenses that came with my J1 are the 10-30 and 30-110. With the camera&#8217;s 2.7X &#8220;crop&#8221; factor, that gives me an equivalent of 27-300mm. The lenses aren&#8217;t particularly &#8220;fast&#8221; (f/3.5-5.6 and f/3.8-5.6), but they both have very good image stabilization (what Nikon calls VR).</p>

	<p>I&#8217;ve been traveling much of the past month, and so had the chance to shoot this camera in Baltimore, DC and Boston. I also had a D7000 with me, and the first two times out shooting I carried them both. But once I found out how much I liked the J1, I left the D7000 behind. I love the size and weight. The AF is fast and accurate, the camera&#8217;s very quick to shoot when I want. The Continuous rate of 5 frames per second is a blast (and up to about 18-frames when shooting <span class="caps">NEF</span> (<span class="caps">RAW</span>) + <span class="caps">JPEG</span> Fine mode). I&#8217;ve found I really like the Auto <span class="caps">ISO</span> setting of 100-3200, because it uses the lower settings whenever it can but doesn&#8217;t hesitate to boost them when the light gets low. Just like I would. And the high <span class="caps">ISO</span> quality is very impressive. Yes, there&#8217;s noise at 3200, but very reasonable and usable. When shooting video (full HD), I can also press the shutter button and get a nearly full-rez <span class="caps">JPEG</span> (I&#8217;m shooting video in full HD, 16:9 aspect ratio instead of 3:2) without any interruption in the video. Nice. And Nikon&#8217;s announced a whole bunch of new lenses on the way, plus an adapter that will let me use my current F-mount lenses on this tiny camera. Can&#8217;t wait to put my 800mm on it!</p>

	<p>Dislikes? Yes, a couple. In Single mode it pops up a preview of the image just shot, briefly, whether you want it or not. And that delays taking a second shot. That&#8217;s the main reason I switched the camera to Continuous, so I can fire a burst without pausing. And I&#8217;m not a fan of <span class="caps">LCD</span>-only as a viewfinder. I&#8217;m old-fashioned &#8211; I like putting my eye up to a viewfinder. Outside on a sunny day it can be challenging to frame carefully, and using a long telephoto is tough while holding the camera out from your face. So that has me looking forward to getting my hands on a V1, with its built in electronic viewfinder. </p>

	<p>Bottom line? Image quality is excellent, considering the size of the camera, lenses and sensor. Feature set is strong, camera&#8217;s easy to use. And that means I&#8217;ll have a real camera (not a crappy cell phone camera) with me more often. This is the camera I&#8217;ve been waiting years for. Good times ahead!</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111026_Balt_484.JPG" alt="ISO 200, 8 seconds, f/16.ISO 200, 8 seconds, f/16.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111026_Balt_191.JPG" alt="ISO 200, 1/250, f/5.0.ISO 200, 1/250, f/5.0.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111026_Balt_277.JPG" alt="ISO 800, 1/15 at f/4.8.ISO 800, 1/15 at f/4.8.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111026_Balt_408.JPG" alt="ISO 3200, 1/40, f/5.6.ISO 3200, 1/40, f/5.6.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111028_Balt_045.JPG" alt="ISO 2500, a/15, f/4.8.ISO 2500, a/15, f/4.8.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111028_Balt_348.JPG" alt="ISO 100, 1/200, f/4.5.ISO 100, 1/200, f/4.5.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111102_Boston_063.JPG" alt="ISO 200, 1/160, f/9.ISO 200, 1/160, f/9.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111102_Boston_093.JPG" alt="ISO 200, a/320, f/7.ISO 200, a/320, f/7.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20111104_MS_002.JPG" alt="]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Camera Gear, Travel, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-11-14T11:37:57+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Joy of Traveling Light</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/the_joy_of_traveling_light/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/the_joy_of_traveling_light/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I’m often asked what gear I take when traveling. And the answer is always the same – it depends on what I want to do. In the case of our recent vacation to Italy, the plan was to relax and enjoy the time together, not be out shooting from pre-dawn into night. Which meant little gear. But I still hoped to make some nice photos.	<p>In this case I went with my standard small kit: Nikon DX body (D7000 this time) with Nikkor 16-85 f/3.5-4.5 and 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 VR lenses. That gave me a body with a ton of great features, and a pair of relatively small, sharp lenses that cover an equivalent of 24-450mm. The two sacrifices I made were no fast lenses (meaning f/2.8 or wider) and nothing exotic in wide or tele. It also meant no tripod, no flash, no filters, and no extra memory cards. But I did bring a laptop &#8211; the little Lenovo X220 I’ve fallen in love with.</p>

	<p>The D7000 has two SD card slots, and I filled them with a pair of 16GB cards. As a pleasure trip, not a photo trip, I chose to shoot <span class="caps">JPEG</span> most of the time, which meant that 32GB of space would be plenty for the two weeks. There’s a common misunderstanding about the <span class="caps">JPEG</span> format. Most people seem to think it’s bad. I just say it’s misunderstood. Sure, there’s data loss through compression, where <span class="caps">RAW</span> (<span class="caps">NEF</span> for Nikon) doesn’t suffer that. And, if you make mistakes in exposure or white balance, <span class="caps">RAW</span> is more forgiving. But <span class="caps">JPEG</span>, at best quality (least compression) still captures a great deal of data, and properly shot (exposure, contrast, white balance, etc.) produces a great file that can be printed <span class="caps">HUGE</span>. And, it’s not all or nothing. Those moments where I think I’ve got a great shot (the lightning from the last post, for example), I simply switch the camera to <span class="caps">NEF</span> (<span class="caps">RAW</span>).</p>

	<p>But more important than all of that, it means I’m just carrying one camera and lens, with the second in a small fanny pack (Thinktank Speed Demon). And I’m on vacation with my wife, who doesn’t want to wait more than a few minutes if I find a picture I have to shoot. Not all photography requires a ton of gear and time. Remember, good pictures come from knowledge of photography, not the amount or cost of the equipment you’ve got. Looking for good light and interesting angles, I also shot panoramas and <span class="caps">HDR</span> images. No tripod? I used tables, bridge railings, or simply raised the <span class="caps">ISO</span>. No flash? Well, I had the built-in one, and for the most part just looked for shots where I wouldn’t need flash. And there’s one last benefit to going light like this. No one thinks you’re a professional photographer. People with large cameras, lenses and bags get more attention, which isn’t always good. I just looked like the average tourist.</p>

	<p>Italy was beautiful, the people and food great. We had a wonderful time. And I got some nice photos, without making a lot of work out of it. That’s a great combination.</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110919_ItalyD2_262.JPG" alt="Castle St. Angelo, Rome.Castle St. Angelo, Rome.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110921_ItalyD4_124.JPG" alt="Arno River, Florence.Arno River, Florence.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110924_ItalyD7_212.JPG" alt="Vespa tour of Chianti Region.Vespa tour of Chianti Region.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110926_ItalyD9_297.JPG" alt="Burrano, near Venice.Burrano, near Venice.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110927_ItalyD10_237.JPG" alt="Venice.Venice.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Photography, Travel, Camera Gear</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-10-16T06:07:35+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Luck and Lightning</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/luck_and_lightning/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/luck_and_lightning/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[My wife and I just returned from a vacation to Italy (yes, it was wonderful).The second night there, Sharon was tired and went to bed early, so I decided to take a walk. And was reminded once again that skill is important in photography, but luck can be even better.	<p>I decided to head toward St. Peter&#8217;s and see how things there looked at night. As I turned a corner and had my first view of Castel St. Angelo, the sky lit up. Last I checked, we weren&#8217;t due for the Rapture, so that meant either fireworks or lightning. As I got up to the bridge over the Tiber, I could see storms moving away in the distance, with St. Peter&#8217;s to the side. Now shooting, or more accurately, trying to shoot lightning, is a challenge. If you try to shoot when you see the lightning, you&#8217;ll miss it every time. The best thing to do is use a long time exposure, and hope to catch a blast when the shutter&#8217;s open. </p>

	<p>Being vacation, photography wasn&#8217;t my priority, so I was traveling light. A single Nikon D7000 with Nikkor 16-85 and 70-300mm lenses. No tripod, no flash, no extra gear. And just a small waistpack (Thinktank Speed Demon). To steady the camera and get the framing I wanted, I put the waistpack on the bridge railing and set the camera on top of it. Next trick was making the time exposure. Lately, Nikon&#8217;s added some cool options for the self-timer in their mid-range cameras, letting you set them to shoot several frames in a row, and also adjust the time between frames. Since the lightning was moving away and infrequent, I needed as many frames as possible to improve my odds. I set it to shoot nine pictures (the max), with one-second between shots. I also turned on &#8220;Exposure Delay Mode,&#8221; which has the camera lift the mirror, pause briefly, then fire the shutter. That helps avoid any blur due to mirror movement. The final step was exposure. Switching to Manual mode, I chose four-seconds at f/7, 200 <span class="caps">ISO</span>. And while I was primarily shooting <span class="caps">JPEG</span> on the trip, I switched to <acronym title="RAW"><span class="caps">NEF</span></acronym> for this.Then it was just a matter of tripping the shutter and praying. </p>

	<p>I got a couple of shots where the sky was partially lit up, and those were okay. And there was a bolt of lightning between shots. And one bolt outside the frame. Arrgh. After 63 frames, though, I got lucky. There was a burst during an exposure, and in the frame. Bingo! I kept shooting, thinking I might get something better, but then my luck ran out. It started raining. After waiting at a nearby newsstand for the worst to pass, I headed back to the hotel. And during that walk thought about how important it is to be prepared and know your gear  when going out to shoot pictures. But the one thing you can&#8217;t prepare for is the unexpected. You just have to hope it&#8217;s the good kind, and get lucky.</p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110919_ItalyD2_305.JPG" alt="St. Peter's behind the Tiber.St. Peter's behind the Tiber.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110919_ItalyD2_308.JPG" alt="No lightning, but close.No lightning, but close.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110919_ItalyD2_325_1.JPG" alt="Jackpot!Jackpot!]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Camera Gear, Travel, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-10-02T16:37:59+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Love My VALS</title>
      <link>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/in_praise_of_valss/</link>
      <guid>http://bluepixel.net/blog/articles/in_praise_of_valss/</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[One of my favorite accessories when doing flash photography is a VALS - Voice Activated Light Stand. In other words, a person you can direct to put a light where you need it. Recently my wife Sharon played this role for me, and is just one of the many reasons I love her :)	<p>A friend of ours was getting married and I had volunteered to do the photos for them. The pre-ceremony photos of everyone getting ready were done with available light (love the quality I get at high <span class="caps">ISO</span>s from today&#8217;s cameras), and for the group shots I set up two lights and a large softbox. The reception, while in a beautiful space, didn&#8217;t have much light to work with. That meant flash, but on-camera flash would be too flat, and the area was too large to light. That&#8217;s where my <span class="caps">VALS</span> came in.</p>

	<p>Sharon accessorized her dress and heels with a lightweight Slik carbon-fiber monopod and Nikon SB-900 Speedlight, mounted on top of it. Shooting a Nikon D3S, I had an SB-900 on it, in Commander mode, to trigger the flash Sharon was carrying as well as adding its light to the scene. The combination worked great. With Sharon staying 90 to 130-degrees off from me, her light pumped in a nice strong side/backlight, which helped separate the subjects from the background and add some depth to the scene.  </p>

	<p>The combination worked great, and gave me photos not possible with just on-camera flash or available light. The only trick was keeping the remote flash in a position where it could“see” the signal from the Commander unit. If it got too far off to the side, or behind me, it wouldn&#8217;t fire. There are ways around that with some radio triggers that still let you use Commander mode, and those are on my wish list. If I’m lucky, I’ll be able to write a blog post about them in the near future. </p><img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110903_Wedding_486.jpg" alt="My VALS in action.My VALS in action.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110903_Wedding_596.jpg" alt="Jenee and Denzel dancing.Jenee and Denzel dancing.<img src="http://bluepixel.net/../images/blog/20110903_Wedding_688.jpg" alt="Group dance.Group dance.]]></description>
      <dc:subject>Camera Gear, Technology, Photography</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2011-09-20T08:19:24+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>
